Tuesday, 25 September 2012
Dil Hildebrand
pane e
Through a broad range of techniques, including collage and trompe l'oeil, Hildebrand tinkers with the conventions of imagery with technical ingenuity and conceptual intuition and care. History and memory trace an oneiric path through his multiple approaches, incorporating various traditions such as Romanticism, Cubism and Surrealism. The influence of theatrical scenography – a field in which Hildebrand worked for nearly 10 years - infuses his canvases with an enigmatic false reality.
Monday, 24 September 2012
Karla Black
Ryan Carr Johnson
used house paint on plywood and hand sanding, which is exactly what i was doing!!
damn... he got there first...
damn... he got there first...
Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Henrique Oliveira
ok so it's sculpture.... but I actually like it, and seeing as I am currently researching installations, maybe this is kind of relevant? speaking of installations, I'm shite at them :/
Gottfried Helnwein
Gottfried Helnwein - I was a child exhibition
Helnwein’s work is visually reminiscent of both old master painting and contemporary cinematography. His use of lighting and mis-en-scene often creates an atmosphere of angst or acquiesence. It is the artist’s painterly treatment of unspeakable acts that affords the viewer just enough comfort to contemplate the horrors that he depicts and it is his masterful handling of his painted images that re-inforces the quiet, intrinsic beauty of his subjects.
The Murmur of the Innocents 14 2010 233 cm x 349 cm mixed media (oil and acrylic on canvas) |
Gottfried Helnwein
"It is the the function of the artist to evoke the experience of surprised recognition:
to show the viewer what he knows but does not know that he knows.
Helnwein is the master of suprised recognition."
- William S. Burroughs
to show the viewer what he knows but does not know that he knows.
Helnwein is the master of suprised recognition."
- William S. Burroughs
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
Monday, 10 September 2012
Martin Stavars.. the new love of my life :')
Sunday, 2 September 2012
a coffee painting on coffee stained paper of my cousins baby
although.. I'm still not happy with it.. only used dark coffee and then deepened dark colours further using a deep umber acrylic.
I found that even wetting the coffee stained paper would darken the page, so therefore I was left with alot of staining.. which I actually found more interesting from an artists point of view, however I am worried that a "normal" person would not perceive it so.
I wanted to use coffee, as it is just a homely substance, and the colouring is rustic and natural and almost aged looking, as opposed to your everyday acrylic paintings which are vibrating with sometimes uncomfortable colour, I wanted the eye to pass over the image of Jack undisturbed, as opposed to his image being violently thrown at your face like BAM!
so his face almost fades into the picture.
It sometimes reminds me of the brown inky animations that appear of the magic map of Hogwarts in Harry Potter.. they're watery nd unsure but flow nicely across the aged paper.
I'm not sure why I'm not happy with this image, perhaps I wanted to be a bit more creative and explore more with imagery, like the paintings below of the portraits blooming from flowers. Perhaps I wanted this portrait to bloom from something?
I will photocopy and experiment.. a passing idea I had was to paint Jacks portrait on the newspaper that was published the day he was born.
photocopy, as opposed to going through the pain staking process of creating a perfect face.. one wrong shadow and everything is ruined.
this is why coffee painting is so tempermental, if the water spreads more than intended the picture is tainted, but this in turn is why I liked it, that the mistakes contribute to creating a perfect picture.
Whats frustrating about showing a painting to family, is that they like to think that a painting should replicate real life, to which I posed the question; "WHY DONT YOU JUST FRAME THE FUCKING PICTURE THEN!!??"
I found that even wetting the coffee stained paper would darken the page, so therefore I was left with alot of staining.. which I actually found more interesting from an artists point of view, however I am worried that a "normal" person would not perceive it so.
I wanted to use coffee, as it is just a homely substance, and the colouring is rustic and natural and almost aged looking, as opposed to your everyday acrylic paintings which are vibrating with sometimes uncomfortable colour, I wanted the eye to pass over the image of Jack undisturbed, as opposed to his image being violently thrown at your face like BAM!
so his face almost fades into the picture.
It sometimes reminds me of the brown inky animations that appear of the magic map of Hogwarts in Harry Potter.. they're watery nd unsure but flow nicely across the aged paper.
I'm not sure why I'm not happy with this image, perhaps I wanted to be a bit more creative and explore more with imagery, like the paintings below of the portraits blooming from flowers. Perhaps I wanted this portrait to bloom from something?
I will photocopy and experiment.. a passing idea I had was to paint Jacks portrait on the newspaper that was published the day he was born.
photocopy, as opposed to going through the pain staking process of creating a perfect face.. one wrong shadow and everything is ruined.
this is why coffee painting is so tempermental, if the water spreads more than intended the picture is tainted, but this in turn is why I liked it, that the mistakes contribute to creating a perfect picture.
Whats frustrating about showing a painting to family, is that they like to think that a painting should replicate real life, to which I posed the question; "WHY DONT YOU JUST FRAME THE FUCKING PICTURE THEN!!??"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)